The announcement on Friday regarding Manchester City potentially being found guilty on most of the 115 charges against them marked a pivotal moment in the history of English football, possibly setting the stage for multiple significant developments to follow. The independent commission’s decision, which has yet to be officially acknowledged by the Premier League, could symbolize the decline of a dominant era. Nevertheless, the repercussions of this verdict are far from settled.
One immediate concern is the sanctions to be imposed, though these could shift as Manchester City prepares to appeal the commission’s ruling. During the appeal process, the future of City’s lavishly assembled team remains uncertain, raising questions about the players’ status and the steps rival clubs might take to seek compensation for perceived damages.
What if City appeals?
City has maintained their stance that the process is ongoing, making an appeal more likely than certain. According to Premier League regulations, they have 14 days to lodge an appeal following the verdict announcement.
<p>While English football can impose penalties on Manchester City, can the Premier League recover from the losses incurred?</p>
<p>
James Benge </p>
</div>
<div class="ArticleShortcode-imageContainer">
<figure class="ArticleShortcode-image img"><img class="" alt="While English football can impose penalties on Manchester City, can the Premier League recover from the losses incurred?" src="https://sportshub.cbsistatic.com/i/r/2026/09/25/9b9e284b-8002-4752-8620-4559ba83b42d/thumbnail/270x152/eab855e69ef28474e2284de4c84303dd/untitled-design-2026-09-25t220219-412.png" loading="lazy" height="152" width="270"/></figure>
</div>
</div>Many fear that this could lead to extended legal disputes within English football. However, the Premier League’s rules suggest that such delays should be minimal. Rule W.86 states appeals should last no longer than five days and be processed in one block, with a 12-week timeline following the filing of the appeal.
If City’s appeal is unsuccessful, despite their consistent denial of any wrongdoing, they would not be able to escalate the matter to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. However, they could still take it to arbitration, where they would need to demonstrate that the independent panel acted beyond its jurisdiction or committed significant procedural errors that compromised their rights. Essentially, succeeding at this level would be extremely challenging.
Could City explore options beyond arbitration? A 2018 email leaked by Der Spiegel, which City denounced as “out-of-context materials supposedly hacked or stolen,” suggested that club officials, including Simon Cliff, indicated a willingness to fight UEFA’s financial investigations vigorously. “Khaldoon [Al Mubarak] would rather invest £30 million in hiring the best lawyers for a decade than accept a financial penalty,” the email noted. If this combative approach continues, legal battles may stretch on.
Following the verdict, Al Mubarak’s first public comment provided little clarity regarding City’s next steps, other than expressing confidence in proving their innocence. He remarked, “The Premier League’s process is lengthy, and our determination in demonstrating the club’s innocence remains strong.”
“While some have hurried to conclusions, and there’s much noise surrounding us, nothing has changed. We have overcome challenges together before, and we will do so again. There are those who aim to undermine our progress, but we will not yield to them.”
What penalties could City face?
Should City’s appeal fail, the sanctions available to the initial panel are extensive. Potential penalties include fines, points deductions, suspensions, or even expulsion from the Premier League. The panel could impose a combination of these penalties along with any other penalties they deem appropriate.
There is also the issue of potential retrospective penalties. The charges against City date back to 2009, the year following their acquisition by Abu Dhabi owners, coloring all their accomplishments since. This could include stripping them of multiple Premier League titles, EFL Cups, an FA Cup, and a Community Shield. Would City be deprived of these accolades, especially for periods when they allegedly did not cooperate with investigations? It’s hard to argue that this team achieved its current status without their owners’ financial backing.
Juventus faced similar repercussions, losing their Serie A titles in 2005 and 2006 following the Calciopoli scandal, during which one title was left vacant and the other awarded to Inter Milan. Many clubs that finished behind City would likely advocate for punishment. However, others will contend that players should not be penalized for infractions that occurred prior to their arrival.
Former Manchester City player Rodri stated on Friday, “What we accomplished cannot be taken away. It’s not something monetary; it’s about effort, damage endured, and standing shoulder to shoulder every day. We deserve our success, and I’m grateful to have experienced such a remarkable chapter in English football.”
Will this resolve the crisis?
Unlikely. At least four clubs have already filed claims indicating that they may seek compensation from City due to lost revenue caused by their infractions. Reportedly, Arsenal, Tottenham, Liverpool, and Manchester United are among these clubs, with others considering similar actions. Several teams may argue their financial positions would have been much stronger if City had played by the rules.
Christian Purslow, a former executive at Liverpool and Aston Villa, highlighted the league’s precarious situation. “This evokes a ‘where does it end?’ scenario, as everything from the nine seasons in which Manchester City breached guidelines has had a tangible financial impact on their 19 Premier League competitors. Each ranking has a direct monetary value; a spot in the Premier League was worth roughly £3 million. Clubs finishing just shy of Champions League qualification might have lost tens of millions. Worse yet, those relegated could claim that they would have avoided the drop had City not benefitted from unfair advantages.”
“Summing up these claims over the last nine years reveals a potential for this situation to escalate dramatically. I sincerely hope that rationality prevails, leading to a cohesive resolution between the authorities and Manchester City that thoroughly addresses all concerns and establishes clear boundaries.”
What will happen to the City squad?
If significant penalties are imposed, queries will undoubtedly emerge regarding the future of their high-profile squad, accustomed to vying for elite titles. Relegation could become a genuine threat for City, complicating the prospects of their standout players. According to CBS Sports sources, several squad members lack release clauses that would allow them to leave for a predetermined fee should City exit the Premier League.
This reflects City’s overall strategy throughout this ordeal, banking on their innocence, evident from their substantial investment in Enzo Maresca’s squad this summer, where they allocated over half a billion dollars to acquire talents like Elliot Anderson, Ayyoub Bouaddi, and Enzo Fernandez.
As of Saturday, September 26, no City players have publicly commented on the matter. Maresca posted a contemplative message on Instagram, featuring an image of bare feet on grass, captioning it with “Time to breathe. Time to analyze. Time to learn.”
Fan Take: This development is crucial for soccer enthusiasts as it challenges the integrity of the Premier League and raises questions about fair play in the sport. The resolutions could reshape the competitive landscape of English football, influencing everything from club finances to player transactions for years to come.
Source: www.cbssports.com
