Unpacking PSG’s Lack of Impact in Chelsea’s Club World Cup Defeat

Paris Saint-Germain experienced a pivotal moment on January 22nd when they managed to turn their season around. Had they not done so, their campaign would likely have ended there, but instead, they found themselves celebrating victories in 17 out of their next 19 matches.

Luis Enrique frequently commends his team’s resilience in the face of challenges, and it’s evident he hoped for a similar reaction when Chelsea took an early two-goal lead through Cole Palmer’s efforts on Sunday.

However, after that point, PSG couldn’t muster a comeback, leading Enrique and his coaching staff to ponder what changes could have been made.

There are certainly various factors at play, such as a missed opportunity by Malogsto and individual mistakes—Nuno Mendes was dispossessed and subsequently failed to capitalize on a shooting chance, leading to a three-goal deficit by halftime. One might rightly point out these errors.

Nevertheless, a deeper analysis suggests that PSG struggled to respond effectively because Chelsea did not give them the chance to. Enzo Maresca’s team executed a unique tactical approach that neutralized the threat posed by PSG’s Nuno Mendes and Kvalashelia combination, particularly in the right flank. The moment a player in a white shirt regained possession—besides the two center-backs who had previously posed a considerable threat—was fleeting, yet it was sufficient for the match.

(After the game, Maresca noted: “We maintained that intensity for about 35 minutes, and at that point, with the scoreline at 2-0, it was enough to secure the win.”

This left PSG in a precarious position, and perhaps Enrique himself felt uncertain. Typically, it is PSG who impose their will on opponents, not the other way around, which presents its own risks. Misjudgments can lead to breaks in pressing play, allowing Chelsea’s speedsters like Desire Doue, Oousmane Dembélé, and Achraf Hakimi to exploit gaps. Chelsea had the athleticism to execute this, unlike many of PSG’s previous adversaries.

Given these circumstances, there’s no need for Luis Enrique to be overly concerned. They lost to an unusually capable opponent, and it was a match that could have swung either way. Yet, this sort of defeat raises eyebrows regarding their overall resilience.

Perhaps players like Vitinha and others are less tenacious than previously believed. Moreover, the uncertainty surrounding Ousmane Dembélé, who seems to struggle against challenging opponents, raises questions about his fitness for high-level play. It might also benefit the team to have a striker who can effectively handle scoring opportunities. Luis Enrique’s ability to analyze Chelsea’s tactics in the first half-hour and adapt could also play a pivotal role moving forward.

play

“Unacceptable” outburst from Enrique after the FC Crew Ram Club World Cup final.

The ESPN FC crew reacts to Luis Enrique’s confrontation with the Chelsea team following the Club World Cup final.

This summer will be significant for PSG. With several young talents in their ranks, questions about the transfer market are inevitable. They need to make decisions regarding Gianluigi Donnarumma, whose contract is expiring. Either they must extend his stay or move on, but negotiations are proving tricky. Reports suggest his agent, Enzo Raiola, desires a salary of €15 million, while the club is only prepared to offer €10 million, including bonuses.

The absence of Willian Pacho (due to suspension) impacted their defense, although Marquinos’ age and Lucas Belardo’s stagnation also raise concerns. They might need additional support at center back.

Beyond these few needs, there aren’t many obvious upgrades on the squad. Thus, for PSG to emerge stronger, the existing players must continue to grow cohesively under Luis Enrique.