The Edmonton Oilers made the decision to part ways with several forwards this offseason in an effort to cut costs and focus on getting younger. Among those who left were Connor Brown, Corey Perry, and Evander Kane. This sparked intriguing discussions on social media, with many debating who the team should have kept if only one player could remain.
Each of these players contributed something unique during the Oilers’ recent run to the Stanley Cup final. While all three received some support in the comments, one clear theme emerged when analyzing their value: the choice depends on whether you prioritize current production, future potential, or simply the player’s presence on the ice.
Evander Kane: Game-Changer
Since entering the NHL, the divisive Evander Kane has often been seen as a difference-maker when healthy. Known for his physicality and scoring ability, Kane was a key offensive force during his time with the Oilers, notably leading the NHL with 13 goals in 15 playoff games in 2021-22. Though he may never reach those heights again, his drive as part of the Vancouver Canucks and the final year of his contract suggests he could still be a valuable asset. At $5.25 million, his blend of skill and toughness is tough to replace.
Corey Perry: Experienced Leader
At 40 years old, Corey Perry brought veteran wisdom and leadership to the Oilers, making crucial contributions during both the regular season and playoffs. He provided an important spark when filling in for injured teammates and was known for his ability to get under opponents’ skin. Despite his heart and soul being appreciated, concerns remain about his ability to keep producing at near 20-goal levels, especially considering his salary and the fact that his best years are likely behind him.
Connor Brown: Balanced Energy Player
Relatively young and adaptable, Connor Brown is arguably the most well-rounded of the trio. After some adjustment time, he proved to be a valuable two-way player, showing speed, versatility, and strong penalty-killing skills. His overall positive attitude both on and off the ice added to his value. While some argue his skill set is replaceable, Brown represents a solid long-term option. His $3 million, four-year contract makes him a middle-ground choice, though his scoring output will determine if the deal pans out.
Who Should the Oilers Have Kept?
Ultimately, the best choice depends on team priorities. If the focus is on affordable production, Perry might be the pick, though likely only for the short term. For physicality and offensive threat, Kane stands out, provided he stays healthy. For consistent two-way play and energy, Brown is the sensible long-term choice.
For a team like the Oilers aiming to win the Stanley Cup, Kane’s potential impact as a motivated and healthy player makes him the most compelling option, despite his higher cost. His upcoming contract year could be pivotal for the Canucks, and the Oilers will have to face him several times this season — a reminder of the significant threat he could pose.
Fan Take:
This debate is a fascinating glimpse into how teams balance talent, cost, and future planning in a salary-capped league. For hockey fans, it highlights the tough decisions franchises must make and how player movement can reshape the dynamics of a division and the race for the Stanley Cup.
