Welcome to Snyder’s Soapbox, where each week we dive into various topics surrounding Major League Baseball. Some issues are urgent, others may seem minor, and most fall somewhere in between. The best part? This content is free and just a click away, guaranteed to make you wiser. Let’s jump in.
This week, we’re once again addressing teams that seem either strapped for cash or cautious about spending. Last week it was the New York Yankees under Hal Steinbrenner’s leadership, and now it’s the San Francisco Giants. Over time, the Giants’ approach might become more cost-effective, but first, let’s understand their current stance.
Despite their nickname, the Giants don’t quite live up to the “giants” of baseball. The term “mediocre” often fits them. In recent seasons—2022’s 81-81 record, 79-83, 80-82, and last season again 81-81—they haven’t been terrible, but also not impressive.
For this franchise, that level of performance is unacceptable, especially as their rivals, the , dominate the sport. The Giants do have some solid players like shortstop Willie Adames, first baseman Rafael Devers, third baseman Matt Chapman, and left fielder Heriot Ramos, plus starting pitchers Logan Webb and Robbie Ray who bring some strength to the rotation.
With that foundation, it’s time for the Giants’ front office to bolster the roster this offseason via trades or free agency. They ranked 13th in payroll last year with 40 players and, despite acquiring Devers, aren’t tightly locked into long-term contracts moving forward.
Their projected payroll for 2026 is about $154.4 million, which is lower than past years where they have exceeded $200 million. The luxury tax threshold stands at $244 million.
The Athletic recently reported on the Giants’ potential signing of Japanese pitcher Tatsuya Imai, but the team appears unwilling to spend the nine figures required for Imai or other top free-agent pitchers, opting instead for cheaper options.
This cautious approach is frustrating, especially considering the Giants’ 2024 operating revenue is estimated at $448 million, while their payroll and related expenses for 2025 are around $213 million. It’s important to note that payroll isn’t the only expense—there’s deferred money owed to Blake Snell, who now plays for the , plus costs related to firing former manager Bob Melvin and hiring new manager Tony Vitello.
Despite these financial commitments, the Giants are currently spending less on their roster than they did in 2024.
Meanwhile, fan attendance has been steadily increasing: from approximately 2.48 million in 2022 to nearly 2.93 million expected in 2025. With such a large fanbase, it’s hard to believe the Giants can’t invest more to compete with big-market teams.
This brings us back to a point similar to last week’s discussion about the Yankees.
If the Giants are truly losing money or barely breaking even, they should be transparent about it and reveal their financial details.
But they won’t. Like most MLB teams, the Giants are making good money but often prioritize profits over investing in top players. They seem content with mediocrity rather than spending the money needed to bring the team back to the World Series.
—
Fan Take: This piece highlights a troubling trend in baseball where teams with loyal fanbases may hold back financially, sacrificing competitiveness for profit. For fans, this means continued mediocrity rather than championship contention, which risks diminishing the excitement and allure of the sport.
