Dan Hooker has expressed his disapproval of Charles Oliveira, claiming that the Brazilian fighter has diminished the significance of the BMF (Baddest Motherfighter) belt. Oliveira captured the BMF title at UFC 326 by defeating Max Holloway, but instead of delivering the expected aggressive and entertaining battle, he chose to take Holloway down repeatedly, controlling him on the ground for over 20 minutes and securing five takedowns, leading to a unanimous decision victory.
This approach left fans disappointed, as they had anticipated an intense and action-packed fight, prompting calls for the UFC to retire the BMF belt. Despite the criticism, the UFC has not yet stripped Oliveira of the title. Oliveira is scheduled to defend his belt against Diego Lopes at UFC 335.
During a recent interview with Submission Radio, Dan Hooker, known for his exciting striking style, criticized Oliveira’s reign as BMF champion, stating, “The belt is stupid, to be honest. It was cool for a bit, and then he kind of made it not cool.”
In response to the backlash, Oliveira remained unfazed and told MMA Fighting that the belt does not define his fighting style. He emphasized that while fans may want a brawl, his priority is to win fights, not to conform to any expectations attached to the belt. Oliveira said, “If the belt is all about guys going in and breaking each other up, then honestly, brother, take the belt somewhere else. That belt is not for me.”
Fan Take:
This controversy highlights the tension between entertainment expectations and effective fight strategy in MMA. As fighters like Oliveira prioritize winning over showmanship, it challenges how belts like the BMF title are perceived and may push the sport to reconsider what defines a “badass” champion.
Source: www.lowkickmma.com
