MLS 3.0: How Major League Soccer’s Innovative Calendar is Its Best Strategy Yet

For the first time, Major League Soccer has made a commendable decision.

This league has often been criticized for being behind a television paywall, frequently changing its playoff structure, overly relying on past international stars, interfering with FIFA’s international schedule, dismissing promotion/relegation, and depending heavily on a century-old domestic cup. It has also been known to prioritize created events during the regular season while limiting teams’ opportunities for growth on a continental scale.

advertisement

However, on Thursday, MLS demonstrated smart leadership by revamping its competitive schedule.

For decades, MLS has gone against the grain, starting its season early in the year, maintaining a busy summer, and wrapping up as the festive season approaches.

Starting in 2027, this 30-team league will align its schedule with most European leagues, running from mid-to-late July through late May.

This monumental shift has been under consideration by MLS executives and team owners for years, and they finally reached a consensus at a Board of Directors meeting in South Florida on Thursday. The last major change of this magnitude was in 2007, when the league introduced the Designated Player Rule, allowing teams to bypass the salary cap to sign high-profile talent like David Beckham and Lionel Messi.

advertisement

Given MLS’s ambitious outlook and its history of questionable choices, this schedule adjustment was long overdue. Ideally, it would have been implemented before the North American World Cup next summer, which casts a significant spotlight on the league, but at least it’s finally happening. This is a positive move for MLS.

Commissioner Don Garber remarked, “Our owners are passionate about elevating our league to one of the best in the world, but being one of the few leagues not aligned with the international calendar has given us a sense of American exceptionalism—playing how we want rather than following how the rest of the world does it.”

While it’s crucial to recognize that not all leagues follow the MLS’s new schedule, this change primarily aims to sync with Europe’s leading leagues. Garber’s assertion emphasizes that to progress in its carefully charted development, MLS must compete with premier global leagues.

However, on the surface, this move may appear counterproductive, as MLS will now face even stiffer competition from other sports leagues during its regular season. Besides a six-week winter break, MLS’s schedule will overlap with the entire NFL season, much of the NBA and NHL seasons, along with college football and basketball.

advertisement

Currently, most of MLS’s action occurs in the relatively mild summer months, competing mainly with MLB, WNBA, and NWSL.

Weather is also a consideration—more winter games will compel teams from colder areas to play away just before or after the winter hiatus. (This year, for instance, the season commenced on February 22nd, but Montreal’s home opener wasn’t until April 12th.) Only about a dozen teams will mostly evade severe winter weather.

Increased winter games imply fewer summer matches, and this year’s intense heat has already led to multiple game delays due to extreme weather conditions. Climate trends indicate summers will likely become harsher, which might complicate scheduling for FIFA events like next year’s World Cup.

The impending schedule alterations aren’t drastic, with MLS simply shifting game dates from around June 1st to July 15th and relocating matches to early December and February.

advertisement

This new calendar is poised to enhance the playoffs, which ideally should draw significant public interest. Currently, MLS’s fall playoff season often gets overshadowed by the NFL and college football, not to mention the NBA and NHL season openers. Additionally, MLS pauses its playoffs for two weeks in November to accommodate FIFA’s international window, which dilutes interest.

Moreover, with championship matches not pre-selected, MLS risks hosting pivotal games under extreme conditions (Kansas City and Toronto have both experienced extremely cold final match-ups). Spring weather is generally more favorable, devoid of football distractions and without the conflicts of international tournaments.

Nevertheless, this decision also stems from MLS’s desire to engage more deeply with the global soccer community. Playing during the summer has often clashed with international tournaments such as the World Cup, European Championship, Copa America, and CONCACAF events.

For instance, MLS will only adjust its schedule during the World Cup and parts of the CONCACAF Gold Cup, leading teams to lose key players for weeks while fans have to choose between league and international matches.

advertisement

The calendar adjustment implies that MLS may need to cancel games during busy international play periods, affecting regular season fixtures in the summer, spring, and early fall.

From a player recruitment perspective, the MLS season opens during international transfer windows in August and January. The off-season is typically the best time for acquiring players, but it’s compressed into January, limiting available talent. At the onset of the summer transfer window, MLS teams usually have less roster space and financial flexibility.

Summer is when interest in MLS players peaks overseas, as European clubs seek to acquire talent. By aligning its schedule, MLS teams will likely be more open to accepting offers, resulting in increased transfer revenue—a vital aspect for club success.

MLS is not the first to adapt its calendar; Japan’s J.League, older than MLS by three years, plans to make a similar shift in 2026 following a winter break.

advertisement

Over a decade ago, Russia, accustomed to severe winters, transformed its calendar to align with most European nations.

While this decision won’t solve all of MLS’s challenges, the U.S. league is still in its developmental stage in the global soccer landscape, oscillating between maturity and impulsive decisions. It faces significant hurdles to achieve the level of popularity enjoyed by other American sports leagues and to compete with the world’s best soccer leagues.

This calendar change marks a promising step forward, but MLS must continue evolving to realize its ambitions. Thursday’s meeting also addressed roster modifications, the elimination of conferences, and playoff restructuring.

advertisement

Garber referred to this as a leap toward “MLS 3.0.”

He stated, “With this solid foundation, what do we need to do in the next 30 years to capture the growing enthusiasm for our league and the overall growth of soccer on the continent, while evolving and embracing innovation and taking calculated risks for the future?”

The calendar shift has been a long-discussed topic for years, and the subsequent choices made will ultimately determine the league’s success or failure.