A week after the conclusion of NASCAR’s significant antitrust lawsuit, discussions have largely focused on which relationships can be repaired and which might remain strained.
Here’s a breakdown:
Michael Jordan/Denny Hamlin – NASCAR Leadership
NASCAR’s main issue during the trial was with Curtis Polk, business partner to Michael Jordan and co-owner of 23XI Racing. NASCAR took issue with some of Hamlin’s actions and statements and, while they regret being sued by Jordan, they likely recognize it came from a passion for racing. Reconciliation might take time, and it doesn’t seem like holiday gifts will be exchanged anytime soon. However, Jordan’s vision of NASCAR still strongly connects with fans, so with time, the rift might heal. Hamlin has been vocal on social media, reminding critics of their remarks during the lawsuit.
Denny Hamlin – Against the World
Hamlin embraces the “11 vs. the world” mindset on the track, and merchandise celebrating this is sold by Joe Gibbs Racing. He was hurt by those who said he shouldn’t have sued NASCAR and insisted on a better contract. Despite disagreements, some respect his fight for fairness, though some fences may never fully mend depending on his perspective.
Denny Hamlin – 23XI Management
Hamlin was portrayed as impulsive in spending by Michael Jordan’s management team, a common clash between the business and competition sides. He was dismissed as a “terrible businessman,” a label Hamlin chose to overlook post-trial. He likened his partnership to a marriage, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to ensure business runs smoothly, indicating these issues may be resolved until future budget disputes arise.
Steve Phelps – Richard Childress
This relationship appears beyond repair. Childress has been unhappy with NASCAR commissioner Steve Phelps since a ruling that affected driver Austin Dillon’s playoff eligibility and fines related to race manipulation and other incidents in 2024. Phelps’s harsh private remarks about Childress shared during the trial further damaged the relationship, and confidential documents hint at further tensions.
Steve Phelps and Steve O’Donnell – Fan Reaction
NASCAR executives Phelps and O’Donnell, responsible for daily operations, showed through texts that they aggressively lobbied NASCAR chairman Jim France for favorable charter deals. While some fans may appreciate their dedication, their derogatory use of the term “redneck” deeply offended many, reflecting poorly on their respect for NASCAR’s fan base, especially among Childress supporters.
Jim France – NASCAR Leadership
NASCAR CEO Jim France stands by his leadership team, stating he values honest communication over “yes men.” Despite knowing the controversial communications, France took no disciplinary action, likely hoping to avoid conflict. The true test will be if Phelps and O’Donnell can lead effectively, as their fate may depend heavily on support from automakers and major sponsors.
NASCAR Owners – Jim France
The owners achieved their desired outcome in the settlement and maintain respect for France and his family’s role in building the sport. At 81, France is unlikely to step down soon, and although friendships may have been tested during this process, the relationship between leadership and owners is expected to heal.
Fan Take: This lawsuit exposed the deep divisions within NASCAR’s leadership and teams but also highlighted a shared love for the sport. How these tensions are managed moving forward will be crucial in shaping NASCAR’s future and maintaining fan loyalty.
